Homepage
Local
COLUMN: Think Again – Exploring the limits of party loyalty
4 minute read Yesterday at 8:13 PM CDTPolitical parties aren’t mentioned in the 1867 Constitution Act.
It’s an interesting omission since nowadays it’s nearly impossible to get elected as an MP or MLA if you aren’t running as an endorsed candidate with a political party. Most independent candidates simply don’t have the name recognition or resources necessary to make a credible run for Parliament or the Legislature.
In contemporary federal and provincial elections, most people vote based on the party rather than on the individual candidate. While being an incumbent MP or MLA does provide a small boost in support, incumbents will still likely go down to defeat if their party becomes too unpopular. That’s a tough pill to swallow for an incumbent who gets dragged down by his or her own party.
Human nature being what it is, it’s not surprising that some politicians are less loyal to their parties than others. Some are mavericks who push back on policies that are unpopular with their constituents while others go so far as to quit their caucus and become an independent MP or MLA. Still others switch parties entirely, and, on rare occasions, make the switch more than once.
Advertisement
Local
COLUMN: On Parliament Hill – Legal ruling and the Canadian dream
4 minute read Yesterday at 5:45 PM CDTGrowing up in Canada, there were expectations. If we applied ourselves, invested ourselves, worked hard and contributed to the world around us, it wasn’t a big leap to expect that we could support our family, buy a house, live in a warm community and enjoy reliable work. Sadly, the next generation is not feeling that same certainty.
You’ve heard Conservatives talking about the Canadian dream and wanting to bring it back. Until the last decade under Liberal rule, Canadians believed that “if you worked hard, you should be able to get a nice home on a safe street in a great neighbourhood”—as Pierre Poilievre has repeated. That was the social contract Canadians were raised to believe was available to them. That was the Canadian promise.
Sadly, in less than one generation, the promise is no longer assumed—especially for young Canadians living in larger urban settings. Under Mr. Carney as Prime Minister, Canada’s economy has suffered from the highest household debt in the G7, the most unaffordable housing in the G7, the lowest investment per worker in the G7, the worst food price inflation in the G7, the second lowest productivity in the G7 and the second highest unemployment in the G7. Furthermore, the Liberal government has made Canada poorer with policies that have blocked economic growth, fueled inflation, and racked up nearly $1.3 trillion in debt, with a deficit of $78.3 billion in their most recent budget.
Canada could be one of the richest, most affordable countries in the world—if bad laws like the anti-resource law, the tanker ban, the industrial carbon tax and capital gains taxes on reinvestment in Canada were repealed. This would be possible if the Liberal government got out of the way of growth.
Local
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bridge Park Manor lacking pet friendly status
1 minute read Yesterday at 2:35 PM CDTI visited Bridge Park Manor a short time ago because I am of the age where I need to make a plan for my future. I was very pleased to see that this type of facility is available in Steinbach.
They have exactly what I’m looking for except they are not pet friendly. A huge disappointment. This rule means I will have to leave Steinbach, something I don’t want to do. I retired here because this is where I wanted to live out my remaining time.
I’m surprised that this rule exists in that pets are very important to us old folks. They provide company and comfort and give us a reason to get up in the morning. Studies have shown this to be true.
I’m hoping by the time (which isn’t too far away) that management will see the error of their ways and allow pets. I’m guessing there are already people living there who would benefit from having their pet with them.
Local
CARILLON SPORTS SECOND SHOTS: Nighthawks championship edition
1 minute read Preview Yesterday at 12:00 PM CDTLocal
Roseau River Anishinabe First Nation calls on province to remove gas line
4 minute read Preview Yesterday at 8:50 AM CDTLocal
Nephew donates uncle’s peatland to national conservancy organization
5 minute read Preview Tuesday, May. 5, 2026Local
Steinbach Family Resource Centre cuts program after Manitoba denies funding ask
6 minute read Preview Tuesday, May. 5, 2026Local
Open Health Niverville opens expansion to the public
4 minute read Preview Tuesday, May. 5, 2026Local
Steinbach Pistons raised $25K for minor hockey this season
2 minute read Preview Tuesday, May. 5, 2026Local
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time to let Hellebuyck go
1 minute read Tuesday, May. 5, 2026Re: As I See it column by James Loewen (Does Hellebuyck want out? If so, good riddance, April 23, The Carillon)
James, I could not agree with you more. In fact, I sent an email to Mike McIntyre of the Free Press last week expressing the same feelings.
You did an even job.
I have not heard from him. Surely, we are not the only ones who have noticed.
Local
COLUMN: The Carillon Flashback December 1, 1993 – Retired builder needs one more licence plate for his collection
2 minute read Preview Monday, May. 4, 2026Local
COLUMN: View from the Legislature – More questions than answers
3 minute read Monday, May. 4, 2026It is the sort of behind the scenes work that most people never see. When a government makes a major policy announcement, for the public, it is often the first time they become aware of it. While it may feel like the beginning of a process, for those working in government on the announcement, it is often the culmination of weeks or months of preparation and work. Everything from where the announcement is made to the communications material behind it are usually carefully scrutinized.
Most of this preparation work is to ensure that when the announcement is made and the questions come from the media and public (the how, what, where and when questions), there are answers. Of course, sometimes not every answer is readily available at the time of the announcement, but the goal is always to be able to fill in the blanks as much as possible to provide credibility for the announcement and the government.
None of this seemed to be the case this past weekend when Premier Wab Kinew announced that his government would be implementing a ban on social media and some artificial intelligence apps for youth in Manitoba. This is a major announcement that immediately garnered attention and, naturally, raised many questions. What age would it apply to? How could a province enforce it? When would it start? Which social media would it apply to? These, and others, are the types of questions that a government would know would come with such an announcement and should be prepared to answer. But no answers, or details, followed the announcement.
That was partially because the announcement wasn’t made at a press conference, as you would expect. It was made at an NDP fundraiser where you had to pay hundreds of dollars to attend. Mr. Kinew made the announcement from the stage and then left. He took no questions after the announcement or in the days immediately following. It left many wondering after, if the announcement was made in haste or with little planning.
Agriculture
1946 to 2026 Watching Steinbach Grow: Steinbach Hatchery celebrates 90 years
4 minute read Preview Monday, May. 4, 2026LOAD MORE HOMEPAGE ARTICLES