Local
Mixed reactions to speed limit bill
5 minute read 3:37 PM CSTTwo southeastern Manitoba municipalities have mixed feelings over a private member’s bill seeking to allow municipalities to set speed limits on provincial roads.
Progressive Conservative MLA for La Vérendrye Konrad Narth introduced Bill 222, The Highway Traffic Amendment Act (Speed limits on provincial roads), to the legislature on Dec. 4. The bill would let any local traffic authority, such as a First Nation or a municipality, to set speed limits on provincial roads in urban areas.
Stuartburn Reeve Michelle Gawronsky said she learned about the bill for the first time when it was read out in the legislature. She called it “unfortunate” because there was no prior consultation with Narth before it was introduced.
“I’m not saying the bill isn’t good, but I just think there’s an awful lot of questions that we would’ve like to have asked Konrad before this actually went before the legislature,” she said.
Advertisement
Weather
Steinbach MB
-25°C, Cloudy with wind
Struggling Pembina Valley Twisters hope coaching change provides spark
3 minute read Preview 12:00 PM CSTCOLUMN: Carillon Flashback Dec. 10, 2001 – Company tradition boosts Christmas hamper campaign
3 minute read Preview Yesterday at 5:33 PM CSTInaugural holiday market packs library
1 minute read Preview Yesterday at 2:51 PM CSTCarillon Sports Second Shots: Dec. 11th edition
1 minute read Preview Yesterday at 12:00 PM CSTSt Pierre-Jolys arena repairs complete
3 minute read Preview Yesterday at 11:26 AM CSTWinnipeg homeless organization voices support for Steinbach’s The INN
4 minute read Preview Yesterday at 8:23 AM CSTManitoba Museum mural showcases Grunthal ice age fossils
3 minute read Preview Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2025Ralph Krueger to be inducted into IIHF hall of fame
3 minute read Preview Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2025Springfield tackles climate change starting with a tree inventory
4 minute read Preview Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2025Calvert, Ueno win Morris Superspiel
3 minute read Preview Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2025COLUMN: Viewpoint – Australia social media youth ban a bold move
4 minute read Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2025Australia took a very bold step yesterday. They made it illegal for anyone under 16 to be on social media. If a social media company is found to have young children as subscribers, they will be subject to criminal prosecution. It is now against the law for Australian kids to have an Instagram, Facebook, X (Twitter), Tik Tok, YouTube, Snap Chat or Threads account.
A special government department has been set up to monitor the ban and social media giants like META began informing their youngest clients over a month ago they needed to save their account photos and messages if they wanted to preserve them.
Parents and children will not be criminally charged if they fail to comply with the new laws, but social media companies will face up to $50 million in fines if they don’t close down accounts of all kids under 16 and carefully monitor their platforms for young users.
A study commissioned by the Australian government at the beginning of 2025 determined that 96 percent of children aged 10-15 in their country used social media and that the majority of them had been exposed to damaging content that promoted violence and misogyny or triggered eating disorders and suicide. More than half of children had been the victim of cyberbullying or experienced grooming behaviour from adults. That gave the government plenty of good data to justify passing the law banning kids from social media.
COLUMN: On Parliament Hill – In the name of religious freedom
4 minute read Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2025Bill C-9 has become a major point for discussion for Canadians—except for members of the justice committee, which saw last week’s meeting on Tuesday abruptly cut short and last Thursday’s meeting cancelled altogether. Sadly, this shutdown also halted Conservative intentions to work into the night to repair what is supposed to be the Liberal government’s flagship anti-hate legislation. In its current form, Bill C-9 is deeply problematic.
Public concern, however, is growing. Faith groups and countless constituents have been raising alarms about the bill’s far-reaching implications. As MP Andrew Lawton wrote in the National Post, Bill C-9 would “expose people of faith to criminal prosecution for the simple act of quoting their own sacred texts.”
According to Toronto Star writer Justin Ling, the bill contains three primary sections. The first concerns the policing of religious symbols and icons. The second targets those who impede access to mosques, synagogues, churches, and other religious institutes when there is “intent to provoke a state of fear in a person.” The third expands hate-related offences, giving police broader discretion in laying charges.
It is little surprise that legal scholars and civil-liberty groups are asking for a full redrafting of this bill – especially given that hate-motivated violent crimes are already being prosecuted successfully. Instead of creating safer environments for people of diverse beliefs, Bill C-9 risks deepening stigmatization, polarization, and social division. These concerns existed even before proposed changes— Conservatives have consistently warned.
COLUMN: Tales from the Gravel Ridge – A season for reflection
4 minute read Preview Monday, Dec. 15, 2025Oakbank’s Caiden Gault honoured after strong weekend
1 minute read Preview Monday, Dec. 15, 2025COLUMN: Report from the Legislature – Affordability a key issue this season
4 minute read Monday, Dec. 15, 2025As the elected MLA and with the holidays approaching I want to take the time to recognize all the volunteers within the Lac du Bonnet constituency. Your dedication to the betterment of our communities is inspiring. Thank you for your time and your commitment, but mostly thank you for helping those less fortunate, not only during the holiday season but throughout the entire year. Your efforts truly make a difference.
Following the ‘nothing new’ throne speech delivered by the Wab Kinew NDP government in November, the Manitoba legislature rose on Dec. 4. What we heard from the NDP both in the throne speech and throughout the legislative session was a lot of rehashing of old announcements that offered no new changes or improvements. With Manitobans currently facing serious increases to health-care wait times, property crimes and cost of living, the throne speech basically repeated the same NDP campaign promises made over two years ago.
Affordability has become a priority issue for Manitobans. With food costs soaring and unemployment on the rise, Manitoba food bank usage is 17 percent higher year-over-year and three times higher than the national average. According to the latest MNP Consumer Index, two in five Manitoba families are within $200 of insolvency. Yet the throne speech offered nothing new towards tax relief or affordability measures for Manitobans. Instead, it said the NDP would conduct a study on grocery prices. Again, recycling an earlier promise made by the premier to crack down on rising grocery prices shortly after being elected. This proves the NDP had no plan to keep prices in check, then or now.
As the official opposition under the leadership of Obby Khan, our PC caucus have been working hard to hold the NDP accountable during the legislative session. Admittedly it has been a difficult process as this NDP government believes it owes no answers to the citizens of Manitoba. Instead, after failing to call their budget bills for seven months, the Kinew government waited until the last day of the fall session to hurry through hidden tax hikes on Manitobans without allowing any debate or input from the public.
LOAD MORE